Binautopsy was built to close the gap between what teams need and what tools deliver.

Why we exist

We built Binautopsy because vendor security questionnaires and SBOM attestations are theater — buyers have no way to verify what is actually inside a binary before signing the contract. Existing tools like Finite State solve part of this, but they leave gaps around the workflows that matter most. Our approach: signed, named-analyst verdicts on a one-page ship/don't-ship/ship-with-conditions memo — not a dashboard of unranked CVEs the customer has to triage themselves.

What we believe

Binautopsy exists because the tools teams actually rely on should be fast, opinionated, and built around the real workflow — not a feature checklist.

How we work

We start with the specific problem — vendor security questionnaires and SBOM attestations are theater — and build the solution around the real workflow, not a generic feature set.

Why now

vendor security questionnaires and SBOM attestations are theater is not slowing down — it is the reason CISOs, third-party risk managers, and procurement are evaluating this category now.

Sister practice

For post-incident forensic engineering — cold-case reconstruction, exfiltration scoping, second-opinion review of prior IR work, expert-witness and deposition support, subrogation forensics — see Hexmortem. Same operator, separate practice; conflict-checked at every engagement.